Login

Login failed. Please try again.

Nathan Granner and Robert Wesley Mason in The Shining at Portland Opera in spring 2025 (photo: Sunny Martini)
Nathan Granner and Robert Wesley Mason in The Shining at Portland Opera in spring 2025 (photo: Sunny Martini)
Article Published: 16 Jan 2026

Both classic operas and new works attract new audiences, research reveals

OPERA America’s 2024 study of opera newcomers, Understanding Opera’s New Audiences, rattled the field when it concluded that opera first-timers “tend to stick to the classics.” After decades of industry-wide investment in new work, the research — based on a survey of 11,000 opera attendees — appeared to suggest that only inherited repertoire mattered.

Fortunately, that’s not quite right. When OPERA America returned to the data this year, it came to a new conclusion: New audi­ences want to see repertoire they’ve heard of, which includes classics and new works. A new OPERA America report, Stick to the Classics? Maybe Not., explains this revised understanding and offers three important corrections to the original report.


Correction #1:
It’s title recognition that matters.

The survey on which Understanding was based aimed to discover if audiences came for inherited repertoire or new work. Because the average first-timer wouldn’t necessarily understand that distinction, the survey used proxies, asking if works were “famous or well-known” to signify inherited repertoire, and asking about works that are by living composes and diverse artists, premieres, or pieces addressing contemporary themes to encompass new work.

The Understanding report suggested that new audiences gravitated toward “the classics” (i.e, inherited repertoire) since most survey respondents said they attended famous or well-known works. In hindsight, this was a flawed alignment, as new works like Alice in Wonderland (Unsuk Chin/David Henry Hwang) or The Shining (Paul Moravec/ Mark Campbell), for example, could also be considered “famous or well known” due to their recognizable titles.

In reality, it is a work’s name recogni­tion, rather than its age or status, that appears to drive interest. During explor­atory interviews held before the research survey, some newcomers spoke about how they were attracted to more well-known operas because they had some familiarity with them — if only with the title.


Correction #2:
Interest in new work is robust.

The original report suggested a wide divide in newcomers’ appetite for inherited repertoire and new work. Interest in the proxy for inherited repertoire — “famous or well-known opera” — was at 82%, while interest in the new work prox­ies — premieres, contemporary issues, diverse artists, and living creators — ranged from just 17% to 41%.

However, when the respondents to these four new work proxies are uniquely combined, the number is much higher: 61% of newcomers expressed interest in at least one of them, as shown in the newly revised chart below. Plus, because the 82% figure encompasses a mixture of name-recognizable repertoire, the inter­est gap between inherited repertoire and new work is likely even smaller.


Correction #3:
Newcomers went to what was available.

The original report’s suggestion that “the classics” got people in the door was skewed by an availability bias. In the 2022–2023 season, for example, 73% of productions available to audiences were of works composed before 1970, and 27% were of works composed after 1970. This ratio of old to new works roughly matched what survey respondents reported attending.

This article was published in the Winter 2026 issue of Opera America Magazine.